PALMISTRY PRIMAL FOCUS

The prevalent image of palmistry is not an accurate one - palmistry is usually associated with fortune telling, crystal balls, special psychic abilities, incense, magic and the like. All of these can be discarded - no extra tools are needed (besides roller&ink), no magic spells need to be cast (or can be cast for that matter), and fortune telling was probably just the first found market of palmistry.

Skeptics focus on this stereotypical group of people that examine hands. These are the self-proclaimed 'magicians', those who give handanalysis a bad name, reading what people want to hear: when you will marry, how many children you will have, lottery numbers, financial success and so on. The tendency is to focus on the more obvious features of the hand - palmar lines, often ignoring the very interesting dermatoglyphics and fingerprints. Skeptics attack these people, and rightfully so. However, amidst all these negative associations with hands it is forgotten that hands ARE interesting, and DO provide information about ourselves.

This fact has not been ignored by researchers, although they have usually focussed predominantly on the dermatoglyphics and usually (but not always) ignore the palmar lines. The reason being that palmar lines have long been considered to be no more than fold creases in the hand (and are even commonly called flexion creases), despite research that has shown there is a definite genetic component to them.

Unfortunately, palmistry is not popular enough for skeptics to have carried out serious, indepth research - contrary to Astrology. In comparison to Astrology, the skeptics research on palmistry is almost non-existent. One of the few examples is a study of the link between the life line and length of life: no relation was found. But then, this is seen as a myth even amongst most (Western) handreaders, so this research avenue was a waste of time and only reduced the credibility of what could be called 'traditional palmistry'. Another skeptics proof is the following experiment: a non-believing psychologist pretended to be a palmist, and managed to fool people into believing that whatever he said was true even though he completely made it up. He even convinced a skeptic. While it is an interesting experiment, it's just an example of cold reading and shows that people are generally quite easily fooled. But this does not disprove palmistry, because no aspect of palmistry had actually been investigated. For those skeptics who believe this experiment provides good evidence that palmistry is all nonsense, I suggest reading about self deception. All this experiment shows is that palmists can have satisfied customers even if there is absolutely no truth in it, as long as the palmist is clever enough. But it is not possible to reason from there that palmistry is all nonsense. That would an example of incorrect deductive reasoning as this experiment investigated cold reading, not actual palmistry principles.

There is also the other extreme of the skeptics - those who believe palmistry has been proven and is actually a 'science'. Palmistry, handreading, cheirology - or whichever name it comes by - is absolutely not a science. While scientists have not made the effort to do serious research, palmists are also to blame. There are a few notable exception - see the links to current research on hands & personality. Hence, there is no scientific proof that validates, or contradicts palmisty's assumption that hands show personality traits. But there has been research which established a link between hands and behavioral characteristics: see journal publications

Modern hand analysts, seperating themselves from earlier 'fortune tellers', read only personality traits, and increasingly look at both palmar lines and dermatoglyphic patterns, in particular the fingerprints. More on handanalysis.

• 'evil signs'
• signs that show you will be rich or will receive money.
• your past - accurate to the year
• your future
• your life-span
• your state of health (although hands to show signs of some conditions, doctors may typically look at your nails)
• how many kids you'll have and
• when you'll marry
• everything...yes, absolutely everything about you is in your hand!
  (since when can us complicated beings be represented in a 'handful' of lines?)

Handanalysis is a matter of combination (combining hand features), and it is the intuition and experience gained from reading hundreds or even thousands of hands that allow a handreader to give an insightful reading. The hands are read as a 'whole', not by looking at each feature in isolation. It is not just the study of the palm (as suggested by 'palmistry'), but of the entire hand. This includes the shape of the fingers, the ridges on the nails, the skin ridges, the color of the skin...every feature is significant to a handanalyst. With enough experience, a handanalyst reads a hand the way we read each others faces in everyday life. We don't look at the way the lips curl to understand that someone is smiling. We look at the face as a whole. But if you have to describe the features of a face that make a person look old or excited or in love or whatever, you're in trouble.

Those that have written books on the subject did exactly that: they attempted to pinpoint specific features, or a combination of features, that indicate a character trait. Last century a handreader might have told you how many children you'll have and whether or not your marriage will last. Today, a handreader or handanalyst is more likely to tell you about your strengths and weaknesses, so you can use this knowledge to better shape your future. Fortunetellers still exist that use the hand as a guide, but in modern handreading this practice is becoming increasingly rare. 

The lines on our palm change throughout our entire life - prints of the same pair of hands over time are evidence of this phenomenon. If you think your hands look exactly the same now as they did a few years ago, you probably haven't paid much attention to them. Small changes in lines do occur and lines can appear and disappear, in particular when it comes to what are seen as stress or nervous lines: those within the life line/around the thumb ('Venus' mount), or the 'mercury' line on the ulnar/percussion side of the hand, going from the life line to the little finger. Handanalysts say that big changes in our lifestyle correspond with big changes on our hands, too. Especially on the major lines: the Life Line, the Head Line and the Heart Line. The Fate Line is also usually considered to be one of the major lines. They are easily identified as the strongest lines on your palm, although the Fate Line is often less clear and sometimes almost non-existent. Some variations can occur: the Life Line and Head Line may exist as one line, called a Simian Line (see also terminology), and some people actually have the opposite manifestation: a double Head and/or Heart Line. The names given are a bit deceiving, though. Traditional palmists did actually read your fate from your Fate Line and your life-span from you Life Line. But the meanings have changed somewhat to 'the way you set your goals' and 'your social identity' respectively. Reading hands is a matter of combining handfeatures, as it is difficult to say something just about just one single feature of the hand without looking at it in the context of the rest of the hand (although this is still done quite often). A long ring finger is said to be indicative of creativity, but - you may ask - how come there are plenty of creative people with a short ring finger? The handreader would say: one has to look at the rest of the hand, too, because handreading is a matter of combination. This is what makes handreading very complex. A lot of intuition is involved, and it is difficult to write down these intuitions of years of handreading experience accurately to share with others. But don't let this discourage you; there is a lot to discover in the palms of our hands, and the good news is: they're still discovering. 

• Left brain / right hand characteristics: logic, details, facts, realistic, cautious
• Right brain / left hand characteristics: intuitive, big picture, fantasy, risk taking

When right-handed the left side of the brain is likely to be dominant. Modern handreaders typically say that your dominant hand is your public face to the world and makes the active decisions, whilst your passive hand reflects the personal and private self. This is perhaps too much of a black and white distinction. Alternatively, one could regard the dominant hand as the dominant personality - which will indeed dominate in public situations. The non-dominant hand could be seen as reflecting the non-dominant personality, which will be expressed less in public and more in private and with people with whom we feel comfortable enough.

The hand is divided up into areas or mounts, like a geographical map, so that areas of the hand can easily be identified. The markings on the hand consist of the major lines, the minor lines, sister lines, little markings (like triangles or squares) and some thin hairlines coming from other lines. Imagine that the hand is a country with high and low hills (mounts) and the lines flowing in and out of the country like rivers. The following is a checklist you can use when examining someone's hands:

1. What is the shape of the hand (e.g. square or rectangular, thick or thin)?
2. Are the mounts flat or fleshy? Which one(s) seem dominant?
3. How soft is the flesh when you press into it, and how does it bounce back when the finger is withdrawn?
4. How flexible are the fingers (bending them backward)?
5. What is the shape and length of the fingers?
6. What is the shape of the fingertips and nails?
7. Look at the main lines - are they long or short, singular or branching, deep or shallow, broad or fine-lined, clear and distinguished or hardly distinguishable?
8. Look at the shape and direction of the main lines - are they straight or curvy, do they go towards the finger or down the palm?
9. Finally, examine the dermatoglyphics - are there any loops or other patterns between the fingers or elsewhere on the palm? What are the fingerprints?

Reading hands is learned by examining as many different hands as possible and comparing them, until you get a feel for what is normal or unusual. You might notice that the fingers are very long, or the hand is incredibly soft, or that one of the lines is unusually pronounced, or wobbly, or broken, or connecting to other lines, and so on. Although there is no such a thing as a 'perfectly normal hand', you will start getting a feel for what is peculiar to a person after examining many hands. Obviously, you will learn more the better you know the person whose hand you are examining, but strangers are best to test your handreading skills.

Even for a non-handreader it is quite interesting to make an inkprint of your hand and look at the pattern it makes - they are quite likely more interesting than you think.